Honest comparison · updated August 2026

A Gamma alternative that exports a real PowerPoint

Gamma is a genuinely good product. But if your deliverable is a .pptx file that a client will open, edit and re-present, its export is the dealbreaker. Here is the full picture.

TL;DR

Gamma builds beautiful web-native decks and shares them as links. Its PowerPoint export flattens dynamic layouts into static images, so the file your client receives is hard to edit. decko works the other way around: it generates native 16:9 slides in a consulting structure and exports an editable .pptx with real text boxes, charts, tables and animations. If the deliverable is the file, that difference is the whole decision.

Why consultants hit a wall with Gamma

None of this is a hidden flaw. It follows from what Gamma chose to be: a web-first format, closer to a scrollable microsite than to a slide deck.

If you mostly share links to visual decks, none of this matters and you should stay. If you deliver files, it matters every single week.

What decko does differently

decko is built around one user: someone who ships client-ready PowerPoint decks, on a deadline, and resents how long that takes.

Gamma vs decko at a glance

Gammadecko
Native formatWeb cards, shared as a link16:9 slides, delivered as a file
PowerPoint exportFlattens layouts into imagesEditable text, charts, tables, animations
Built forMarketing, social, web-first teamsConsultants and founders who deliver .pptx
Deck structureGeneric templates, strong visualsConsulting structures: exec summary, steerco, proposal
ResearchAI generation from promptWeb research with sources cited on slides
Free planCredit-metered, watermark on exportsOne complete deck, full export, no watermark, no card
Paid planPlus at $10/month (as of mid-2026)Pro at 25 €/month, unlimited

On price, Gamma is cheaper. If the export were equivalent, that would decide it. It is not: the time you spend rebuilding exported slides costs more than the difference at any reasonable hourly rate.

When you should stay with Gamma

An honest comparison cuts both ways. Keep Gamma if your decks are shared as links rather than files, if visual wow matters more than an editable structure, or if you want the widest template variety for marketing-style content. decko's design ceiling is deliberately sober: clean, consistent, on-brand for advisory work. If you want maximal visual flash, Gamma will make you happier.

Frequently asked questions

Is the exported file really editable?

Yes. Text is text, charts are native PowerPoint charts, tables are tables. Your client can change a number, a title or a color without asking you for the source file, because the .pptx is the source file.

Can I bring an existing deck into decko?

Yes. Attach a .pptx, notes, or data files and decko treats them as the brief for the new deck.

What does decko cost?

The free plan includes one complete deck with research, images and the full PowerPoint export, no credit card needed. Pro is 25 € per month for unlimited decks, edits and research.

Does it work in my language?

The interface is available in English and French, and you can brief decko in any language you like.

Free plan · no credit card

Judge it on the export

Generate one real deck, export the .pptx, open it in PowerPoint. That five-minute test is the entire comparison.

Create a deck free

One full deck free, with research, images and export included.

Related: decko vs Gamma, feature by feature · decko vs Beautiful.ai · Where Tome users went